Journal Computer Science Network Security -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Journal Computer Science Network Security? Answer: Introduction The Enterprise Resources Planning (ERP) System is a type of Enterprise System that integrates the business process management in real time environment (Antero, 2015). The Enterprise Resource Planning and suitable vendors are discussed in this report to give detailed analysis to Chris and Patricias Legal support (CPLS) for effective implementation. The organization is a small Enterprise Resource Planning to adopt Enterprise Resource Planning System and considering suitable vendors. Chris and Patricias Legal support is considering selecting the appropriate vendors and associated Enterprise Resource Planning System for their business operations. The purpose of this report is to focus on details of suitable vendors associated with Enterprise Resource Planning System. The outline of this report is overview on Enterprise Resource Planning System purchase process and requirements for adoption in Chris and Patricias Legal support. The other points are information gathering on vendor research, evaluation of appropriate vendors and Enterprise Resource Planning System architecture and implications. Requirement assessment of Chris and Patricias Legal support Chris and Patricias Legal support is considering implementing Enterprise Resource Planning System which is cloud based to operate this business in an effective way (Chaudhary, 2017). The requirement of Chris and Patricias Legal support from Enterprise Resource Planning System are various according to their need. The requirements are to record the details of all the lawyers and their clients. The record includes advice given to each client, past cases related to the client and their proficiency and information related to client. The Chris and Patricias Legal support also wants Enterprise Resource Planning System to record the details of all the lawyers such as name, address and bar councils at the time of registration. The Enterprise Resource Planning System should also record court details related to a particular case. The Enterprise Resource Planning System analysis and appropriate vendors are discussed in further paragraphs. Enterprise Resource Planning System purchase process-General Guidelines The purchase process for Enterprise Resource Planning System has general guidelines which includes various stages. The stages of purchase process are demonstrated in the form of questionnaire format. The question for first stages is that the Enterprise Resource Planning software user friendly or not for the Chris and Patricias Legal supports (Devos, Van Landeghem and Deschoolmeester, 2016). This stage is necessary as the organization must understand the nature of Enterprise Resource Planning System before adoption to gain effective future benefits. The user friendly choice is required to be understandable to the employees and clients. The question for second stage is that the Enterprise Resource Planning System will be compatible with legacy software during transition in the Chris and Patricias Legal support. This stage refers to the secure transition of data from exiting system to new Enterprise Resource Planning System. This ensures legacy of transition in Chris and Patricias Legal support. The question for third stage is that how many vendors a company should evaluate for purchasing of Enterprise Resource Planning System (Giachetti, 2016). This is a crucial stage as Chris and Patricias Legal support should evaluate its working process and choose vendors according to the need of the organization. Chris and Patricias Legal support should ensure vendors who can provide on-premise, cloud and hybrid solutions for Enterprise Resource Planning System. The question for fourth stage is to analyze if Enterprise Resource Planning System is flexible or not with changing business conditions and goals. This stage describes that in future if Chris and Patricias Legal supports business condition and goals are changed then Enterprise Resource Planning System should be flexible to adopt with the changes (Gupta et al., 2017). The question for fifth question is that the cost related to Enterprise Resource Planning tools is affordable or not. The Enterprise Resource Planning is alone not enough to benefit Chris and Patricias Legal support; it needs some tools and training which incur extra cost. The overall cost of Enterprise Resource Planning System including tools and training is very high. Therefore, Chris and Patricias Legal support should consider their budget and also if they can afford or not. The question for sixth stage is to know the capacity of Enterprise Resource Planning System to work smoothly. This stage is to understand the capacity of Enterprise Resource Planning System to work in a particular organization concerning their needs. Chris and Patricias Legal support should consider this to prevent risks and any future hazard (Jain and Sharma, 2016). The question for seventh stage is to what should be accomplished through Enterprise Resource Planning System. This is major stage as Chris and Patricias Legal support should decide what they need from Enterprise Resource Planning System. The general requirements are availability of tools, security for data storage and cost of tools and upgrades. The question for eighth stage is that the particular organization is able to handle Enterprise Resource Planning System or not. This stage is to consider if Enterprise Resource Planning System can be handled or not by Chris and Patricias Legal support (Johansson et al., 2015). This is because little knowledge of Enterprise Resource Planning can prove damage to the Chris and Patricias Legal support. Potential vendors of ERPs and ERP System offerings The potential vendors in the market which are growing are discussed below in the following paragraph. The first one is SAP. SAP is the leader in Enterprise Resource Planning Systems vendors market. It has potentials of handling extremely complex business situations and contains large number of relational database tables to store the data. However, at times, SAP is considered to be too complex and difficult to handle. It is suitable for large enterprises and it is client server based having three layer model, presentation, application and database (Johansson et al., 2014). The functions of SAP include full support to financial analytics, operation analytics and workforce analytics. The second one is Oracle. Oracle comes in second place in Enterprise Resource Planning vendors market. It is best known for relational database. Oracle provides applications such as Enterprise Resource Planning raise Performance Management, Business outsourcing application, human capital management and project management application. Oracle comes with packages which includes Enterprise Resource Planning ris e edition and standard edition. The Enterprise Resource Planning edition is for large organizations and standard edition is for medium-sized organizations (Kulkarni et al., 2015). Oracle helps to provides decision making, tracking of work progress, processes human resources and maintenance of records in real time. The third is Microsoft Dynamics. Microsoft Dynamics comes in third place in Enterprise Resource Planning vendors market. Microsoft Dynamics mostly focuses on medium sized organizations. The major advantage it provides is great ease of use in organizations. Microsoft Dynamics improves performance and profitability based on generated information through real-time monitoring and analysis (Leon, 2014). Microsoft Dynamics has functions that allow processing of budget, resource management, track progress and time delays to improve the working process. Microsoft Dynamics function allows management of budgets, and trends and relationships across the organization. The alternative Enterprise Resource Planning vendors in the market include Sage, Infor and Odoo. The Sage is a recently introduced brand in the market which has become popular in a short span of time. Sage has introduced three types of Sage Enterprise Resource Planning and they are Sage 100, Sage 300 and Sage X3. The Sage 100 is suitable for small to medium sized businesses and covers the basic requirements of these businesses. The Sage 100 basically targets manufacturing and distribution firms including basic Enterprise Resource Planning modules and applications. The Sage 300 is suitable for small to medium businesses that operate in multiple countries across the world. The Sage 300 is basically a mid-level offering among other Sage Enterprise Resource Planning vendors (Leyh, 2014). The Sage 300 has all the packages and applications of Sage 100 along with multi-language and multicurrency support provided by Sage Enterprise Resource Planning vendor. The Sage X3 is suitable for indust ries having sole purpose that is the industry having single target. The Sage X3 targets fewer industry however, it offers deep feature sets to these industries. The Infor is another alternate to the top Enterprise Resource Planning players in the market. The Infor is a mid-tier player and it targets medium to large sized manufacturing industries mainly. The Infor Enterprise Resource Planning is specifically for manufacturing purposes. The Infor Enterprise Resource Planning is categorized into Infor CloudSuite and Infor Visual Enterprise Resource Planning. The Infor CloudSuite is a web based Enterprise Resource Planning which targets industrial, automotive and aerospace manufacturers across the world (Lu, Liu and Li, 2016). The Infor Visual Enterprise Resource Planning is designed for small to midsize manufacturing industries. Infor Visual ERP offers several features and functions for specific purposes in various manufacturers. It offers additional features beyond the standard Enterp rise Resource Planning modules such as project management, quality management, shop floor automation and others. The Odoo is another Enterprise Resource Planning vendor which has shown massive growth in recent times (Morgan and Ngwenyama, 2015). Odoo is a complete package including project management, billing, accounting, inventory management, manufacturing and purchasing that offers to industries. Odoo offers efficient exchange of information among the Enterprise Resource Planning modules for communication. Odoo is a web based tool which is free for initial subscriptions however after that one has to pay for it (Nagpal, Khatri and Kumar, 2015). Odoo targets small to medium sized Enterprises and it specializes in cloud-based Enterprise Resource Planning for various industries. Research on shortlisted ERP vendors The small industries like Chris and Patricias Legal support, today are adopting ERP System due to its potentials. The previous study on Enterprise Resource Planning System variations in small and medium sized suggests that Enterprise Resource Planning is necessary for different functions. The functions include individual productivity, management control and customer satisfaction (Ruivo, Oliveira and Neto, 2015).The other study shows that industries choose various factors and methods such as Grey-based model before selecting appropriate Enterprise Resource Planning vendors (Khan and Faisal, 2015).The situation of Chris and Patricias Legal support suggests that they should choose among these three Enterprise Resource Planning vendors, Oracle ERP, Infor ERP and Sage ERP. The detailed analysis of Oracle ERP vendor, Infor ERP vendor and Sage ERP vendor are given as follows. According to Oracle financial report, financial position of Oracle ERP vendor is high as their revenue and earnings are higher. The support issues of Oracle Enterprise Resource Planning vendor are that they do no support product technology (Peng and Gala, 2014). The hardware and software infrastructure of Oracle Enterprise Resource Planning vendor are Service Oriented Architecture and MS SQL server, Linux and Windows respectively. The direction and currency of software of Oracle Enterprise Resource Planning vendor are Release 12 and SaaS solution respectively. The release strategies of Oracle Enterprise Resource Planning vendor are definite (Ramasamy and Singh, 2017). The involvement of users in upgrades of Oracle Enterprise Resource Planning vendors is huge. The financial position of Infor ERP vendor is moderate as it is still growing. The support issues of Infor ERP vendor are tha t they do not support multi-echelon inventory optimization. The hardware and software infrastructure of Infor ERP vendor are Service Oriented Architecture and MS SQL server, Linux and Windows respectively. The direction and currency of software of Infor ERP vendor are 6.5.4 and SaaS solution respectively. The release strategies of Infor ERP vendor are frequent. The involvement of users in upgrades of Infor ERP vendors is moderate (Sedera, Gronau and Sumner, 2015). The financial position of Sage ERP vendor is high due to high growing rate. The support issues of Sage ERP vendor are that they do not support certain operating systems. The hardware and software infrastructure of Sage ERP vendor are On-premise or Cloud and MS SQL server, Linux and Windows respectively. The direction and currency of software of Sage ERP vendor are 6.5 and SaaS solution (cloud version of Sage X3) respectively. The release strategies of Sage ERP vendor are moderate with special focus on core accounting (Seet hamraju, 2015). The involvement of users in upgrades of Sage ERP vendors is high. Recommended ERP for Chris and Patricias Legal support The recommended Enterprise Resource Planning vendor for Chris and Patricias Legal support is Oracle Enterprise Resource Planning. This is because Chris and Patricias Legal support require database to store their clients, advocates and judges records in separate places to be able to view them easily and effectively (Tarhini, Ammar and Tarhini, 2015). Oracle ERP has huge database that helps Chris and Patricias Legal support to store their data. They also want human resource management through the Enterprise Resource Planning System. Therefore, from the above Enterprise Resource Planning rise Resources Planning vendors, Oracle ERP vendor is the appropriate Enterprise Resource Planning for Chris and Patricias Legal support. ERP modules to Chris and Patricias Legal support stakeholders The modules of Oracle Enterprise Resource Planning are Materials Management, Sales Order Management, Financial Management, Supply Chain Management and Additional Capabilities. The first one is Materials Management (Tian and Xu, 2015). This is represented to Resource Management stakeholder of Chris and Patricias Legal support. This module helps in improves in global inventory visibility and control multi-mode inventory operations along with scalability in complexity of Chris and Patricias Legal support working. The second one is Sales Order Management. This is represented to sales team stakeholder of Chris and Patricias Legal support. This module helps in aligning sales efforts across channels, increases sales, reduce cost errors, manage leads and increase accuracy. The third one is Financial Management. This is represented to Finance department stakeholder in Chris and Patricias Legal support. This module helps in maximizing throughput of various resources, frequently determining the best production time, manage complex transactions, evaluation of expenditures and track profitability (Umar et al., 2016). The fourth one is Supply Chain Management. This is represented to Supply chain department stakeholder in Chris and Patricias Legal support. This module helps in seamless integration and flexibility, reduced planning time, increase productivity and reduce decision making complexity. The fifth one is Additional Capabilities. This is represented to Human Resource Stakeholder in Chris and Patricias Legal support. This module helps in human resource performance, compensation, retention of clients and advocates and managing advocates profile. Benefits of ERP system for Chris and Patricias Legal support Chris and Patricias Legal support wants the Enterprise Resource Planning as cloud based to record client and advocate details, which lawyer offers service to which client details, transaction details. Adding to this Chris and Patricias Legal support also wants Enterprise Resource Planning to record details of different lawyers offered services to clients in each month. They also want to assign a unique ID to each lawyer handling a particular case. Therefore, the above modules are appropriate for these requirements and also Oracle provides cloud based services with huge database. The missing functionality of Oracle ERP is that they lack in customer relationship management. However it can be solved as the other modules integrates the task of managing the overall working process; the customer relationship management will be achieved by managing the details of clients and advocates efficiently. The options to resolve this functionality is to upgrade the Oracle ERP system timely as they are on verge to resolve this problem. The architecture of Oracle ERP is Integrated Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) Gateway, Middle Layer and Mobile Client Application. The SOA architecture is a core component of Oracle ERP which allows PL/SQL integration interfaces and deploys them as web services to the Company (Weng and Hung, 2014). The Middle Layer is a custom integration layer that provides security. The Mobile Client Application is a native application that interacts with Enterprise Resource Planning modules through SOA Gateway. The Implications of Oracle ERP module architecture is that it provides scalability, flexibility, security and web based services. Conclusion Therefore from above discussions it can be concluded that Chris and Patricias Legal support requires Enterprise Resource Planning System to fulfill their work process efficiently. The recommended Enterprise Resource Planning vendor is Oracle Enterprise Resource Planning which is most appropriate and suitable. Chris and Patricias Legal support requirements are scalable which can grow in particular time and will reduce in other times. This Enterprise Resource Planning System is scalable and flexible to be used for their entire business functions. The modules are appropriately structured to suit the needs of Chris and Patricias Legal support. The general guidelines to choose are necessary to take into account before adoption of Enterprise Resource Planning System. The discussions also focus on various Enterprise Resource Planning vendors to be chosen for the Company needs. The various types of Enterprise Resource Planning are evaluated in this discussion with focus on their different as pects. The missing functionality of Oracle Enterprise Resource Planning vendor is also discussed with recommendations to resolve this problem. Therefore, Oracle Enterprise Resource Planning, cloud based, is appropriate and it should be implemented with proper requirements and tools. Recommendations The recommendations for Enterprise Resource Planning System to be implemented in Chris and Patricias Legal support are given in following paragraphs. The first recommendation is to acknowledge the requirements of Chris and Patricias Legal support to properly understand the areas which will need Enterprise Resources Planning System. The second recommendation is to properly understand the Oracle Enterprise Resource Planning System to implement for their working process. The third recommendation is to implement each module effectively and help the workforce to understand the modules of Oracle Enterprise Resource Planning System. The fourth recommendation is to test the Oracle Enterprise Resource Planning System modules in the office premises to check whether it is properly working or not. The fifth recommendation is to have consistent Internet network as cloud based Oracle Enterprise Resource Planning System requires stable network to function properly. These recommendations should be adopted so that Oracle Enterprise functions properly and operate in a systematic manner. References Antero, M.C., 2015. A Multi-case Analysis of the Development of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems (ERP) Business Practices.Morten Friis-Olivarius The Associative Nature of Creativity. Chaudhary, S., 2017. ERP through Cloud: Making a Difficult Alternative Easier.International Journal of Engineering Science,6079. Devos, J., Van Landeghem, H. and Deschoolmeester, D., 2016.INFORMATION SYSTEMS FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES. SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN AN. Giachetti, R.E., 2016.Design of enterprise systems: Theory, architecture, and methods. CRC Press. Gupta, S., Misra, S.C., Singh, A., Kumar, V. and Kumar, U., 2017. Identification of challenges and their ranking in the implementation of cloud ERP: A comparative study for SMEs and large organizations.International Journal of Quality Reliability Management,34(7), pp.1056-1072. Jain, D. and Sharma, Y., 2016. Cloud computing with ERP-A push business towards higher efficiency. Johansson, B., Alajbegovic, A., Alexopoulo, V. and Desalermos, A., 2015, January. Cloud ERP adoption opportunities and concerns: the role of organizational size. InSystem Sciences (HICSS), 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on(pp. 4211-4219). IEEE. Johansson, B., Alajbegovic, A., Alexopoulos, V. and Desalermos, A., 2014. Cloud ERP Adoption Opportunities and Concerns: A Comparison between SMES and Large Companies. InPre-ECIS 2014 Workshop" IT Operations Management"(ITOM2014). Khan, H. and Faisal, M.N., 2015. A Grey-based approach for ERP vendor selection in small and medium enterprises in Qatar.International Journal of Business Information Systems,19(4), pp.465-487. Kulkarni, A., Hegde, N., Sharma, M., Kulkarni, A.A., Hegde, N. and Sharma, M., 2015. Educational ERP systems in the marketa comparative study.International Journal of Innovative Research Science in Technology,1. Leon, A., 2014.Enterprise resource planning. McGraw-Hill Education. Leyh, C., 2014, September. Critical success factors for ERP projects in small and medium-sized enterprises-The perspective of selected German SMEs. InComputer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), 2014 Federated Conference on(pp. 1181-1190). IEEE. Lu, G., Liu, J. and Li, F., 2016. Application of ERP System in Small and Medium-sized Tire Enterprise. Morgan, H.M. and Ngwenyama, O., 2015. Real options, learning cost and timing software upgrades: Towards an integrative model for enterprise software upgrade decision analysis.International Journal of Production Economics,168, pp.211-223. Nagpal, S., Khatri, S.K. and Kumar, A., 2015, May. Comparative study of ERP implementation strategies. InSystems, Applications and Technology Conference (LISAT), 2015 IEEE Long Island(pp. 1-9). IEEE. Peng, G.C.A. and Gala, C., 2014. Cloud ERP: a new dilemma to modern organisations?.Journal of Computer Information Systems,54(4), pp.22-30. Ramasamy, M. and Singh, R.P., 2017. BENEFITS, CHALLENGES AND SELECTION OF CLOUD ERP SYSTEMS USED IN SMEs. Ruivo, P., Oliveira, T. and Neto, M., 2015. Using resource-based view theory to assess the value of ERP commercial-packages in SMEs.Computers in Industry,73, pp.105-116. Sedera, D., Gronau, N. and Sumner, M. eds., 2015.Enterprise Systems. Strategic, Organizational, and Technological Dimensions: International Workshops, Pre-ICIS 2010, St. Louis, MO, USA, December 12, 2010, Pre-ICIS 2011, Shanghai, China, December 4, 2011, and Pre-ICIS 2012, Orlando, FL, USA, December 16, 2012, Revised Selected Papers(Vol. 198). Springer. Seethamraju, R., 2015. Adoption of software as a service (SaaS) enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems in small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs).Information systems frontiers,17(3), pp.475-492. Tarhini, A., Ammar, H. and Tarhini, T., 2015. Analysis of the critical success factors for enterprise resource planning implementation from stakeholders perspective: A systematic review.International Business Research,8(4), p.25. Tian, F. and Xu, S.X., 2015. How Do Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Affect Firm Risk? Post-Implementation Impact.Mis Quarterly,39(1). Umar, M., Khan, N., Agha, M.H. and Abbas, M., 2016. SAP-ERP implementation: Change management model using qualitative approach.International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security (IJCSNS),16(9). Weng, F. and Hung, M.C., 2014. Competition and challenge on adopting cloud ERP.International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology,5(4), p.309.